• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Panther, sRGB, web browsers
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Panther, sRGB, web browsers


  • Subject: Re: Panther, sRGB, web browsers
  • From: Uli Zappe <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 03:48:05 +0100

Am 14.12.2003 um 04:37 schrieb Roger Breton:

ColorSync services are there for applications to take advantage of. Maybe
you're advocating for more 'intelligence' at the system level:

Exactly. Basicallly, I'd like to be able to set all generally sensible parameters at the system level.

would you want to strip Photoshop of more color conversions options?

As I said, since Photoshop is an app that's so focused on imaging, there may be additional options that are useful for very specific cases in Photoshop but are not useful in general, and therefore not available at the system level. But what could be done at the system level should be done on the system level and only there; it just makes for unnecessary complexity to reiterate that in specific apps.

I don't see why it would be such a bad thing to have it in a browser as in
an advanced color application like Photoshop?

Primarily not bad, but unnecessary. What could you possibly do with ColorSync options in a browser? You'll probably always want these options to be set in a way that standard web content displays and prints right; I can hardly imagine someone changing his browser ColorSync prefs from web page to web page he's visiting.

Now, if one image from the web is very important to you and you want to print it as good as possible, but the default settings don't work well, you might want to change these settings for this very image. But doesn't it make sense to use a specialised imaging app (Photoshop or whatever) for this specific purpose? Otherwise you'll suffer from featureritis. I mean, you might also want to optimize the contrast of this important image, but you still don't advocate that a browser should implement basic image editing functionality, do you?

So, it's "bad" at a "second level": because it's *unnecessarily* complex, at least from the Unix and the Cocoa point of view whose ideal is small, modular, specialised programs that cooperate.

But I may be alone in this opinion. I compare it to learning a foreign language: tell me what the main verbs are, what are the rules of conjugation are and I'll manage to
construct my sentence myself to remain in charge of the meaning I want to convey.

Yep, you should be in charge. But you should execute that at the system level, not in every single app. ;-)


Bye
Uli
________________________________________________________

Uli Zappe, Solmsstra_e 5, D-65189 Wiesbaden, Germany
http://www.ritual.org
Fon: +49-700-ULIZAPPE
Fax: +49-700-ZAPPEFAX
________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Panther, sRGB, web browsers
      • From: Roberto Michelena <email@hidden>
    • Re: Panther, sRGB, web browsers
      • From: Chris Murphy <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Panther, sRGB, web browsers (From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Using Gretag InkFormulation and Eye-one
  • Next by Date: Re: Panther, sRGB, web browsers
  • Previous by thread: Re: Panther, sRGB, web browsers
  • Next by thread: Re: Panther, sRGB, web browsers
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread