• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Gamma values on Windows XP
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Gamma values on Windows XP


  • Subject: Re: Gamma values on Windows XP
  • From: Chris Murphy <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:48:04 -0700

On Wednesday, February 12, 2003, at 09:33 AM, "Bruce J. Lindbloom" <email@hidden> writes:

4) Always load your VLUTs with ramps and keep them there.

5) Profile your monitor (while the VLUTs are already ramped and will remain
forever ramped) and let Photoshop color manage the display for you.

The only product I'm thinking of at the moment that will do only display characterization without first calibration is ColorVision OptiCAL. And I'm not sure if they "reset the VLUT" prior to doing this, or if it's just prior to a calibration. I pretty sure I've see it happen just prior to calibration.

The other problem is that some video cards are jacked up. Maybe I've just had bad luck with a few of them, but the nVIDEA GeForce 2MX card I have in my PowerMac 867 - when the LUT gets zero'd out just before calibration - produces a *strong* green cast on pretty much every monitor I've hooked it up to. And on an old Powerbook the same displays would have a semi-strong magenta cast.

So the in/out voltage of each channel from the video card must not be exactly the same, when the VLUT is set with the same ramps. Thus - some calibration is needed in order to gray balance the monitor to something reasonable. If it's all done in the CMS, only a window that's being color managed will be gray balanced. A gray desktop pattern won't be gray. In theory everything should eventually pass through the CMS on OS X, but that's not currently the way it is. So in the meantime, I think we're going to need at least some minimum calibration capability. But we also need to hold the video card vendors to a higher standard too.

6) Down with 'vcgt'! <g> (Except when using it to force ramps into the
VLUTs.)

*If* it's given that we need some kind of calibration, vcgt I think is a good thing because we don't need those silly startup applets to apply calibration. The Display Manager handles it. And if you select a different profile (let's say you're going to do some video editing and want to compensate for a lower light level that will be used to few the video), the LUT is updated automatically by the Display Manager. At least, on Mac OS. On Windows, vcgt is ignored. So not only do you need a silly startup applet, but if you select some other profile and make it active, the LUT isn't update to what it should be for the profile to be valid.

Chris Murphy
Color Remedies (TM)
www.colorremedies.com/realworldcolor
---------------------------------------------------------
Co-author "Real World Color Management"
Published by PeachPit Press (ISBN 0201773406)
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >Re: Gamma values on Windows XP (From: "Bruce J. Lindbloom" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: color accuracy in printing
  • Next by Date: re: Photoshop 6/7 problems with Optical Monitor profiles
  • Previous by thread: Re: Gamma values on Windows XP
  • Next by thread: Re: Gamma values on Windows XP
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread