Re: Camera Raw Plug-in
Re: Camera Raw Plug-in
- Subject: Re: Camera Raw Plug-in
- From: Terry Wyse <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 16:08:44 -0500
Does anybody know if the Sigma SD9 is supported? For that matter, has
anybody tested this camera? So far, most of what I've read sez the Foveon
chip may actually live up to the hype.
Just curious,
Terry
on 2/21/03 2:06 PM, bruce fraser wrote:
>
At 12:46 PM -0500 2/21/03, Jim Rich wrote:
>
> Yesterday, I got to work with a group of photographers using Nikon D1s and
>
> use Color Eyes 20/20 and the Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw plugin.
>
>
>
> It took hours to get the Color Eyes target lit correctly to create what
>
> looked like a good input profile. OTOH using the Photoshop Camera Raw plugin
>
> was very easy. The conclusion is simple, the Photoshop Camera Raw plug-in
>
> works and saves hours of profiling time so a photographer can get on with
>
> the business of shooting.
>
>
>
> I think there are still reasons to profile a digital camera but not as many
>
> now that this plug-in has entered the scene. Has anyone on this list
>
> experienced the difference between custom digital camera profiles and the
>
> Photoshop Camera Raw plug-in and would you share those differences. I am
>
> looking for feedback about quality.
>
>
I wouldn't dream of profiling any camera that's supported by
>
cameraRAW. I've done side-by-side tests with custom profiles/camera
>
vendor's software and CameraRAW with the Kodak DCS 460 (all the Kodak
>
cameras are "unofficially" supported -- they work, but Adobe won't
>
discuss any problems) and the Canon EOS-1Ds, and I got much better
>
results from CameraRAW.
--
__________________________________
WyseConsul
Color Management Consulting
v 704.843.0858
e email@hidden
__________________________________
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.