Re: Profiling Digital Cameras: Camera Raw
Re: Profiling Digital Cameras: Camera Raw
- Subject: Re: Profiling Digital Cameras: Camera Raw
- From: "Bertho Boman" <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 07:50:10 -0500
- Organization: Vinland
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jan-Peter Homann" <email@hidden>
>
The best solution is the one, which gives the best results in the eyes
>
of the user.
That is true but since taste and equipment vary, the best solution is where the user
can choose what he/she wants to use and not be forced to use just one option!
>
>
At least it must be an integrated solution with image-analysis and
>
-optimization of the RAW-Data. A 100% ICC-solution would need an
>
individual profile for every lightning situation.
Further, cameras do differ from sample to sample. What is wrong with "normalizing" a
camera to display colors correctly under a given "white" light? I do not buy that I
have to profile the camera for each lighting situation. A picture of a sunset is
expected to be reddish and so on. If the lighting is unusual, I can always tweak it
in PS later but at least the camera was standardized to start with.
I also fail to understand why to propose $3000 solutions when all we want is an
option to use existing profiling technology and equipment.
Bertho
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.