Re: WMU Profiling Review - version 3.0 now available
Re: WMU Profiling Review - version 3.0 now available
- Subject: Re: WMU Profiling Review - version 3.0 now available
- From: "Peter Baumbach" <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 11:41:55 +0100
On Wed, 01 Jan 2003 17:57:16 +0100 Neil Snape wrote
>
One thing I'd really like to point out though is the validity of the above
>
assessment of monitor calibration is a by the numbers approach which
>
involves no critical user assessment. Indeed the colours reproduced are of
>
concern ,yet graduation of tone can almost outweigh these factors
>
in lieu of
>
tonal graduation. There are many ways of quickly verifying the ramps
>
produced by soft/hardware calibrating. The easiest one is of course a 0-255
>
K (rgb=) graduation across a full screen.
>
Without a good graduation and neutral grey all other colour accuracy
>
comparisons are isolated and random checkpoints that in no way validate a
>
profiler combinations quality. If there is a way of qualifying levels after
>
lut's and or curves in the case of 3D profiles , it'd be a welcome
>
inclusion.
Fully agree, the eye seems to be much more sensitive to a non-smooth
graduation (look at skin tones) and to warm-cold changes in the neutral grey
tone ramp than to the mean deviation of the absolute accuracy of an
unweighted sample of points.
Happy New Year to all.
Peter Baumbach
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.