Re: ProofMaster/PerfectProof
Re: ProofMaster/PerfectProof
- Subject: Re: ProofMaster/PerfectProof
- From: Henrik Holmegaard <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 07:40:51 +0100
beeldx/ Jeroen Mulder <email@hidden> wrote:
>about the assumption of offset ink behaviour.
>2 idlike to know when I am printing from adobe98 (send to the rip with
the
>right fingerprint) are the colors being forced in a smaller colorspace
>because of the offset ink setting.
As long as you don't use fingerprints for the space to be simulated and
use ICC device profiles combined with linearizations into fingerprints
for the inkjet, then complexities don't arise. First you linearize the
inks using the linearization tools the same as in other RIPs, then you
combine the linearization with the ICC device profile made for the
inkjet. Version 1.10.1 has more user friendly linearization than
version 1.10 and jobs are rasterized really fast. But I'm puzzled by
the default spectral engine and when to leverage it, that's true. By
the way as far as I recall the RIP uses GhostScript which has native
PDF processing out of the box. We need fast RIPs with ink linearization
support on Mac OSX which is not to say we don't need RIPs to be as user
friendly as possible.
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.