• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: 20" Cinema Displays 1024x1600
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 20" Cinema Displays 1024x1600


  • Subject: Re: 20" Cinema Displays 1024x1600
  • From: John Gnaegy <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 12:57:11 -0800

Problem is: all the
new screens have a too high native resolution. Unlike the CRTs, the LCDs
cannot use a lower resolution without displaying a less optimal image.

You're working under that assumption that CRTs don't have an optimal resolution, but they do, and even then it's not that optimal.

There's a finite dot pitch determined by the shadow mask or the vertical wires and phosphor dots. So at best there is one resolution at which each virtual pixel lines up with each physical trio of pixel generating holes in the mask. But even that isn't optimal, because each virtual pixel on a CRT is represented by three (or more?) phosphor dots, and even then they're not lined up exactly except in one resolution. And, most CRTs don't have a regular dot pitch across or up and down the screen, meaning the dot pitch can vary from the center to the left and right sides, and often the vertical dot pitch is different than the horizontal dot pitch. I followed this line of thought a few months ago when I was considering buying an Eizo versus a flat panel, weighing the pros and cons. The variable resolution of the CRT was a big pro for me until I realised the above, and started looking closely at some of my favorite CRTs like the 17" Studio Display (the CRT version that used a Mitsu Diamondtron tube). It's a great tube, really crisp, but in up close comparison to my flat panel it's nowhere near the crispness. An LCD at native resolution shows absolutely perfectly square and regular pixels, and you just cannot acheive that with a CRT. In practice I agree that an LCD at a non-native resolution is not as clear as in the native resolution, but you have to compare that to the behavior of a CRT in which there is no comparable ideal resolution. There may be an optimal resolution for a CRT, but no ideal resolution giving perfect pixels. The LCDs appeal to me on this obsessive perfectionist basis. And in practice they look great.

---
John Gnaegy
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: 20" Cinema Displays 1024x1600
      • From: Pete Carter <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: 20" Cinema Displays 1024x1600 (From: Paul Schilliger <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Advice
  • Next by Date: Re: 20" Cinema Displays 1024x1600
  • Previous by thread: Re: 20" Cinema Displays 1024x1600
  • Next by thread: Re: 20" Cinema Displays 1024x1600
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread