Re:Review of Large-Format Inkjet Contract Proofers
Re:Review of Large-Format Inkjet Contract Proofers
- Subject: Re:Review of Large-Format Inkjet Contract Proofers
- From: DS <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 11:32:03 -0700 (PDT)
Cris Daniels wrote:
>
The standard black in the 10000CF and the Photo Black
>
in the 10600 UC are only so black. Forget everything
>
else, they just might not have enough density to use
>
for contract proofing. What is your max black density
>
needed? If its over 2.0 you are out of luck with the
>
Ultrachrome or archival inks which both top out
>
around there, it depends on the paper. The 7600/9600
>
UC can achieve a smoother gray balance and better
>
photographic quality, but the black is the same.
Thanks for the clarification, Cris--you and C. David
were describing two differnt black issues. I'll be
certain to see if the UC black will be dense enough
for our purposes (I have a hunch that it will be,
though).
>
Full coverage 1440 dpi 8x10's on a 7600 can take up
>
to 7 minutes depending on the options checked in the
>
driver. Forget 2880dpi, you'll get nothing done.
Thanks for noting this; 7 minutes is a bit longer than
I had expected, so I will be certain to discuss this
with my dealer.
If we find the 9600 to be a bit too slow and want to
increase our capacity, I may suggest getting a 2200.
Can we hook a 2200 up to the same BEST XXL RIP that is
running the 9600, or are we required to purchase a
separate copy of Colorproof for each printer we want
to drive?
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.