Re: Canon W2200 comments
Re: Canon W2200 comments
- Subject: Re: Canon W2200 comments
- From: Terry Wyse <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 10:20:45 -0400
Sorry, I had to change the subject line to something more fitting. It drives
me nuts when folks leave "colorsync-users digest" as the subject line. Pet
peeve of mine I guess.
on 5/7/03 6:13 PM, Richard Kenward wrote:
>
A
>
further point which has bothered me is the suggestion that the black is
>
insufficiently dense for contract proofing work. Would you or anyone
>
here like to comment please regarding the density issue?
I believe I was the one who commented on the low black Dmax on the W2200 a
while back. Just for reference, I was using Dupont ChromaPro XP Gloss paper
and was only getting about a 1.70-1.80 on that paper. I can't imagine a
change of paper improving that significantly. My experience tells me I need
about 1.90 or higher to get a minimum L value in my profile of 12 or less.
Anything more (L) than that and I'm guaranteed to have shadow rendering
problems. Other than that, a very nice printer. It's too bad.
Later,
Terry
--
__________________________________
WyseConsul
Color Management Consulting
v 704.843.0858
e email@hidden
__________________________________
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.