• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: ICC Profile location for PS RAW
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ICC Profile location for PS RAW


  • Subject: Re: ICC Profile location for PS RAW
  • From: Mark Buckner <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 21:24:15 -0600

On 11/3/03 7:07 PM, "Andrew Rodney" <email@hidden> wrote:

> You can take the same RAW file in ACR and produce different appearances each
> day but as long as you, the user get the appearance you want, it doesn't
> matter if it differs day in and day out. It's not about matching or
> consistency.

Well, if all we're talking about is "pretty pictures" and artistic
expression, I'd go along with that. For some lovely fall color landscapes I
could see fiddling around with color to create something that I want to
portray, even if it has no relationship to the actual color of the trees,
grass, etc. For people who operate in this realm, ACR is may be a good tool.

On the other hand, I shoot professional sports for a living. Uniform and
logo colors are developed very carefully by the teams and they expect a
faithful reproduction, which is why I got involved with Color Management in
the first place. When the uniforms of the St. Louis Blues made them look
more like the St. Louis Purples, we (I!!) had a problem. Not only do my
clients expect the color to be right, they most certainly do believe that it
"matters if it differs day in and day out". I certainly don't work in a
studio, and I am faced with shooting in a wide variety of lighting
conditions. If I am asked to provide files for a publication, some of which
were made in available light in another team's building, and others are
strobe-lit in my building, I still need the color to match as closely as
possible. Before I found a good camera profiling tool, I spent more hours
in editing to get the results my clients demand and deserve. A good camera
profile for each camera has solved almost all of those concerns, leaving me
more time to read this list!

As for camera profiling being difficult and somewhat expensive, I'd just say
that (A) usually nothing of much value comes without effort, and (usually)
some expense and (B) the time and money saved in the long run makes it a
good investment, at least for me.

Have either you or Bruce built a profile with ColorEyes 20/20? That's the
product which I used to build my profiles, and I have yet to find a
lighting situation in which the profiles are not extremely helpful, so long
as one gray balances manually and carefully.

Thanks,

Mark
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: ICC Profile location for PS RAW
      • From: Jim Rich <email@hidden>
    • Re: ICC Profile location for PS RAW
      • From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: ICC Profile location for PS RAW (From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: ICC Profile location for PS RAW
  • Next by Date: Re: ICC Profile location for PS RAW
  • Previous by thread: Re: ICC Profile location for PS RAW
  • Next by thread: Re: ICC Profile location for PS RAW
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread