Re: To iterate or not to iterate?
Re: To iterate or not to iterate?
- Subject: Re: To iterate or not to iterate?
- From: Klaus Karcher <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:52:33 +0100
- Organization: schrift & form GmbH
Roger Breton wrote:
What it does is compare the print data (press sheet) to the initial proof
data (inkjet output) and makes appropriate corrections for any deviations,
to minimize the differences. And this procedure can be used many times --
iteratively, as is noted. With the differences becoming less every step??
Sounds too good to be true...
I'm still testing this feature, but that's what it seems to be for me
until now: too good to be true.
The iteration apparently only optimizes the immediate environs of the
measuring points of the testchart, not or only slightly the huge space
between them. If you only regard this grid points, the result looks very
fine, but the proofs as a whole wont become substantialy better.
One simply load the two profiles and hit the Calculate button.
Of course you have to measure a testchart printed with the two profiles
involved for every step.
I will try this ASAP and report back to the list.
Klaus
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden