• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: CM challenge for an architectural photographer
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CM challenge for an architectural photographer


  • Subject: Re: CM challenge for an architectural photographer
  • From: Robin Myers <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:00:44 -0800


On 15 Dec 2004, at 09:41, email@hidden wrote:

if you shoot digitally or with film - would it be a good idea to expose a chart and generate a profile for achieving correct color of the walls (as the original post was concerned with) under those lighting conditions ?
certainly more work and should be compensated for, but theoretically would that work ?



The problem with this scenario is that you have several possibly different reproduction requirements. By exposing a test chart and trying to reproduce the scene you may be able to create a colorimetric match, but it will probably not look like the actual room. The reason is that the colors the observer senses in a room are a complex blend of the paint on the wall, the texture of the wall (yes, this can alter the color), the blend of illuminants (the interior lights, the filtered sunlight coming through the windows and skylights, and any additional lighting added by the photographer), and the light reflected from the floors and furnishings off the walls will effect the wall color. If the floor is brightly colored, I can guarantee you will see some of this color reflected from the walls. This is why the professional architectural rendering software goes through very complex ray tracing, radiosity and other computations for each pixel in their renderings.


Remember, the color of the daylight will change during the day, so the best you can try is to get it right for a particular time. The choice of test chart illumination (room, window, photographic) will also alter the profile, so this can be a problem.

Oh, and do not forget the metamerism failure we are all used to with the final print. Where is the client going to view the printed image? What type of lighting, surround, illumination level, ...

If I were approaching this project and the goal was to reproduce the observer's view of the room as accurately as possible, I would profile the camera for noon daylight illumination, but I would take spectral readings of the important objects in the room (floors, walls, furnishings) from the camera's viewpoint with a telespectrophotometer. This is a spectrophotometer that can measure spectra at a distance. I would use the spectral readings to adjust the camera's image to make certain the colors were accurate to the perceived scene.

Good luck on this one!

Robin Myers
www.rmimaging.com
Maker of SpectraShop, THE spectral analysis program.

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Re: CM challenge for an architectural photographer (From: email@hidden)

  • Prev by Date: Re: GMG Camflow cmyk seps
  • Next by Date: Re: To iterate or not to iterate?
  • Previous by thread: Re: CM challenge for an architectural photographer
  • Next by thread: Re: CM challenge for an architectural photographer
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread