• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: SWOP as religion
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SWOP as religion


  • Subject: Re: SWOP as religion
  • From: Henrik Holmegaard <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 10:11:41 +0100

Dan Caldwell <email@hidden> wrote:

>These standard profiles will provide us the tools we need to proof most any
>job. As mentioned above it is up to the printer to be able to print to these
>standards on their equipment.

Yes! Let the press operator and the printing press manufacturer address the ability of the printing press to print to sufficiently narrow tolerances that the process can be statistically sampled by an ICC profile and simulated on a studio inkjet with the appropriate consumables and cross-rendering. The printing press is not the concern of the desktop, it has other concerns to address.

The original concept advanced in the mid-1990s was to separate in prepress (OPI) to a set of some ten standard printing conditions, and reseparate at the press with device links. This concept was called 'virtual CMYK'. The standard objection is that because of the limitations imposed upon device links by the ICC Specification, and because of the limitations imposed on ICC profiles in the PostScript pipeline, reseparation only works if all objects in the page-based document reflect the same gamut and separation. And in an early binding approach it is as likely that all CMYK objects will reflect the same gamut and separation as that Tinkerbell will drop by for tea -:).

That said, the issue on the desktop remains remote proofing. Ever since OPI arrived it has been possible to conduct capture services, assembly services and print services in separate schedules and at separate sites. Each attempt to start a debate about remote proofing in distributed color workgroups has been stonewalled, presumably because only one RIP manufacturer has the technology. But that does not change the fact that the discussion is increasingly important now that the concept of colorimetrically controlled printing conditions has started to come across.

Thanks,
Henrik
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Prev by Date: Re: SWOP as religion
  • Next by Date: Re: SWOP as religion
  • Previous by thread: Re: SWOP as religion
  • Next by thread: Re: SWOP as religion
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread