Re: Artisan calibration/soft proof workflow
Re: Artisan calibration/soft proof workflow
- Subject: Re: Artisan calibration/soft proof workflow
- From: Richard Kenward <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 20:38:48 +0000
In message Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Andrew Rodney writes
on 1/5/04 12:49 PM, Richard Kenward wrote:
Now I realize that it is unlikely to have the same level of accuracy as
the Artisan and accuracy is all important here, but I wonder in gamut
terms just what percentage of the ARGB gamut this does.
Hard to say for a number of reasons. Certainly any colors that fall outside
display gamut are "invisible" to the user editing those colors. So a wider
gamut display can be useful in such cases. Then the next question becomes,
how much smaller is the Artisan gamut to Adobe RGB. How you set the Artisan
might play a role here. I set mine to D65, native gamma (not forcing to 1.8
or 2.2).
Dear Andrew
Many thanks for coming back so swiftly on this query. I am such that
there will be others here who will find what you saying interesting.
I loaded both Adobe RGB 1998 and my Artisan profile in ColorThink and looked
at them both in 3D. Impossible to tell you what I saw without sending you
the rotation in 3D in Quicktime (something I think I can do using Snap Pro
X). But I'll try to "describe" what I'm seeing:
Snip
While I'd love to have a gamut that's larger, I'd agree that accuracy and
consistency are more important to me. IOW, larger but not accurate is a much
worse situation to be in.
Agreed on both counts though of course at the moment we have to guess at
the accuracy and consistency of the Mitsubishi! Have you heard anything
more about this particular screen and when it is due to appear on the
shelves?
Thanks
Richard
--
Richard Kenward
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.