RE: Anyone care to comment?
RE: Anyone care to comment?
- Subject: RE: Anyone care to comment?
- From: "michael shaffer" <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:51:11 -0230
- Importance: Normal
Terry Wyse writes ...
>
On Sep 21, 2004, at 2:14 PM, michael shaffer wrote:
>
>
> The required degree of tonal ajustment in either case posterized the
>
> histogram with 8bit data, but created smooth histograms with 12bit
>
> data.
>
>
>
I'm not necessarily agreeing with Dan, but he would say that what the
>
histogram tells you vs. what's actually visible in the final result is
>
irrelavent. It can easily be proven that 16bit produces a nicer
>
histogram but it's unclear how "bad" a histogram has to look till it
>
becomes visually noticeable in print.
... and I should have made the same point! Except for the fact, both of
these adjustments involved either (1) skin tones, in which posterization
we'd redily pick up on, ... and (2) continuous sky, in which any
posterization is obvious. The other point, is the severity of adjustment
applied ... and that I should have used a fill flash in the first place
...<g>...
cheerios :o)
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden