Is anyone using the EFI Color Profiler? Or iQueue?
Is anyone using the EFI Color Profiler? Or iQueue?
- Subject: Is anyone using the EFI Color Profiler? Or iQueue?
- From: Rich Apollo <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 07:18:28 -0500
On Apr 12, 2005, at 2:04 PM, email@hidden wrote:
Someone had suggested GMB's iQueue to help control Quark's poor color
management. Does anyone have any info./advice on this?
<x-tad-smaller>
I've been using iQueue for years. GREAT product. The only real bitch is that it will not run under OSX (only Winders or OS 8/9/Classic)
iQueue allows you to color manage tiff, pdf, eps (vector and raster), jpg, ps, et cetera. You can maintain black channel integrity (raster and vector). You have access to all your rendering intents. You can choose ColorSync or LogoSync.
It's the only way I have found to effectively color manage PDFs, vector elements, and postscript files. SuperColor/ColorEditor from Heidelberg might work for PDFs, but their demo is too limited and I can't get anyone to tell me how much the damned thing costs. Adobe keeps building Acrobat in such a way that third-party tools are necessary (yeah, I've got version 7).
Anybody know, can you color manage PDFs, vector elements and postscript files through Applescript/Python? Of course that would only give you access to the Apple CMM.
One caveat, iQueue works through cascading Hot Folders, so it's always polling. I've heard it can drag down network speeds. Never really an issue for me.
</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller>Rich Apollo
Priority Litho
314-344-1144
email@hidden</x-tad-smaller>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden