RE: CG220 emulating AdobeRGB
RE: CG220 emulating AdobeRGB
- Subject: RE: CG220 emulating AdobeRGB
- From: Steve Upton <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:09:17 -0700
At 1:25 PM -0400 8/19/05, Mike Eddington wrote:
> >I think your conclusions of 10-12% Adobe rgb sound about right for the
>current crop of high gamut monitors.>
>
>Perhaps you're right, and overall I'm not unhappy with the performance
>of the CG220 from a prepress standpoint. But Eizo's publication, the
>CG220 White Paper, and the CG220 ICC profile sample from Eizo's website
>seem to me a tad misleading in that regard. If you need a measurement
>device that costs more than the already expensive monitor to get the
>advertised results, and the software doesn't even support it, well, that
>just don't seem right.
OK... overall the graphs and the numbers seem to agree with your findings.
The red point is the closest with a dE76 of 2.28, Green is 6.46 and blue is 16.4
This results in gamut volumes of 1,306,423 for aRGB and 1,142,659 for the CG profile.
Still, a honkin' gamut no matter what! I wonder what difference it has in the use of the monitor. These are VERY saturated colors that I am pretty sure would never be able to be reproduced in print. Curious though...
Regards,
Steve
________________________________________________________________________
o Steve Upton CHROMiX www.chromix.com
o (hueman) 866.CHROMiX
o email@hidden 206.985.6837
o ColorGear ColorThink ColorValet ColorSmarts ProfileCentral
________________________________________________________________________
--
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden