Re: RIPs [was: Shiraz Rip and How to get great prints]
Re: RIPs [was: Shiraz Rip and How to get great prints]
- Subject: Re: RIPs [was: Shiraz Rip and How to get great prints]
- From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:06:37 -0700
Title: Re: RIPs [was: Shiraz Rip and How to get great prints]
In a message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:34:28, Rolf Gierling wrote:
Marco Ugolini wrote:
...at RIT's Munsell Color Science Lab, they strongly recommend the use of Delta E 2000 and tend to dismiss the usefulness of older versions of Delta E.
Look at it from another point of view. The european/german organisations FOGRA, bvdm and ECI, which are mainly involved into the research of all that Process Standard things and the resulting ISO 12647 worldwide norms, have a big problem:
The Delta E ab is the only one that can be used in juristic way to judge color consistancy. It is a fact that Delta E 2000 or CMC or something like that is more sophisticated, but no court in the world would accept it, because they are not fixed in an ISO norm.
Thank you for the clarification, Rolf.
>From what you say, it appears to me that for private use (such as photo-quality inkjet prints), Delta E 2000 can be seen as the better methodology, while Delta E ab might be advisable when proofing to something like SWOP, due to the lack of ISO standardization for Delta E 2000. Is that a fair statement?
Best regards.
--------------
Marco Ugolini
Mill Valley, CA
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden