• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Grayscale perception
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Grayscale perception


  • Subject: Re: Grayscale perception
  • From: Ernst Dinkla <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 14:47:53 +0100

Robert L Krawitz wrote:
   Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 13:58:52 +0100
   From: Ernst Dinkla <email@hidden>

Graeme Gill wrote:
> Ernst Dinkla wrote:
> >> As I understand it Gutenberg (used to be Gimp-print) is now 16 bit all >> the way. QTR is based on Gimp-print there's a chance that this could >> be the next step for QTR too.
> > It also comes down to whether the screening actually supports 16 bits
> resolution.
> > Graeme Gill.


That may be an issue for Gutenprint with color printers. Less with quad printers. Anyway the Gutenprint information says less banding issues (color) with 16 bit mode.

Gutenprint (and Gimp-Print, for that matte) does all of its screening
and color corrections in 16-bit resolution, although only Gutenprint
(aka Gimp-Print 5.x) offers 16-bit inputs in general cases.  The issue
of whether you'll see more banding with 8-bit vs. 16-bit *inputs*
depends upon your source.  If you do external correction/profile
application in 8-bit space and feed 8-bit data to Gutenprint (or any
other driver), you're likely to see banding (and/or its counterpart,
loss of tonal detail) in highlight gradients.  If you do that
correction in 16 bit space you should be able to avoid that problem.

I understand that but the text in the announcement of Gutenprint puts it slightly different:


The higher precision may improve results with certain source
material, particularly if it contains smooth color gradients.
The result would be freedom from banding, particularly in
highlights where it might be visible with 8-bit color
computation. It may be somewhat slower than 8-bit printing.


Is the 16 bit mode smoother than the 8 bit mode when both get ideal 16 bit color gradients input ?


Ernst

                   --
          Ernst Dinkla


www.pigment-print.com ( unvollendet ) _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Re: Grayscale perception (From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Grayscale perception (From: Ernst Dinkla <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Grayscale perception (From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Grayscale perception (From: Ernst Dinkla <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Grayscale perception (From: Robert L Krawitz <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: eyeone problem with Monaco Profiler
  • Next by Date: Re: Grayscale perception
  • Previous by thread: Re: Grayscale perception
  • Next by thread: Re: Grayscale perception
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread