Re: Pulse x Eye One
Re: Pulse x Eye One
- Subject: Re: Pulse x Eye One
- From: Dana Rasmussen <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 13:16:46 -0700
On 6/16/05 9:10 PM, "Terry Wyse" wrote:
> Dude, lighten up. Personally, I think the accessory kit is worth it.
>
> This is my first experience (at a customer I sold one to) with the
> Pulse and, frankly, I find it superior to the Eye-One. It's whole strip
> reading scheme seems to be much more reliable than the Eye-One, much
> less sensitive to operator technique (too fast/too slow) compared to
> the Eye-One. Being able to take your measurements untethered and then
> dumping it into the software is really pretty cool. No more $#*%! USB
> cables to get in the way while taking the measurements.
>
> If I didn't have too many auto-scanning instruments as it is, I'd
> consider adding the Pulse Color Elite RGB+CMYK + OPTIX XR to my own
> color toolbox. Only annoyance is not being able to easily import the
> Pulse data into MonacoPROFILER for a bit more black control when
> building CMYK profiles.
>
> Two thumbs up for the Pulse.
>
> Terry
> WyseConsul
> Color Management Consulting
> email@hidden
> 704.843.0858
> http://www.colormanagementgroup.com
> http://www.wyseconsul.com (coming soon)
My only real problem with the Pulse is that for some strange reason Profiler
does not support it, and will not until the release of v5 according to
Monaco support. Considering that Eyeone Pro is supported, I just find it
very strange
Is anyone else having problems with the new PULSE ColorElite download? I
have tried several times, but stuffit is unable to extract anything from the
download.
--
Dana Rasmussen
Seattle, WA
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden