• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: CMYK to CMYK Conversion question
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CMYK to CMYK Conversion question


  • Subject: Re: CMYK to CMYK Conversion question
  • From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 14:08:49 +1000
  • Organization: Argyll CMS

Chris Murphy wrote:
On Apr 12, 2005, at 8:30 PM, Joseph Yates wrote:
We notice now when we convert from the old CMYK to the new CMYK (either Relative Colormetric or Absolute) that the colors become very unsaturated and the color balance is noticeable off as well. Some of

I would not expect a DeviceLink profile to miraculously solve this problem. It starts out merely as a concatenation of the two profiles you're already using. Depending on what makes the DeviceLink, you can add special handling for the black channel, or preserve channel purity with or without scaling (anything yellow only stays yellow only, no contamination). But if you're seeing a lack of saturation in reds, or blues, or greens, and you have a gray balance issue - those kinds of colors are still going to render as they would using the original profiles to create the DeviceLink. So I'd investigate the two profiles and find out why this is happening - some 3D modeling, and also test each profile to see if there is excessive gamut compression occurring. Are you getting good conversions with both profiles separately? If so I'd be suspicious about the A2B table in the source profile, responsible for defining how CMYK is mapped to the PCS. You might try conversions using the saturation intent and see if that gets you an improvement at all (unlikely but worth a shot).

A device link can help solve this sort of problem if it is created using a "smart CMM" approach to the gamut mapping, instead of simply concatenating the individual profiles.

The reduction in saturation you see is likely to be the result of the
in built gamut mapping of the output profile, which is probably set for
a generic compression, or compression from an assumed RGB gamut.

Using relative colorimetric intent for both profiles may minimize
the gamut compression effects.

Loss of grey balance indicates inaccuracy in one of the profiles.

Graeme Gill.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: CMYK to CMYK Conversion question
      • From: Chris Murphy <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: CMYK to CMYK Conversion question (From: Chris Murphy <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Difference in instruments measurements
  • Next by Date: Re: Difference in instruments measurements
  • Previous by thread: Re: CMYK to CMYK Conversion question
  • Next by thread: Re: CMYK to CMYK Conversion question
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread