Re: Time to measure ECI2002 with a Spectroscan?
Re: Time to measure ECI2002 with a Spectroscan?
- Subject: Re: Time to measure ECI2002 with a Spectroscan?
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 07:39:59 -0500
> With all that said, a Spectroscan T must be worth about the cost of; lets see,
> 1 quarter the worth of lets say, an eye-one. Therefore, that¹s about around 75
> US dollars. Being so slow that would be a deal, right?
>
> Anyone willing to sell their Spectroscan T for $75? I would go for that.
> Contact me off line and I¹ll make the deal happen. :^)
>
> Sam Landry
Clearly, Sam (and others), the Spectroscan performance varies by host
application. Using argyll, Graeme writes that it takes him 64 minutes. Using
MeasureTool, we know it takes over and hour and a half. With PrintOpen, I'm
told it takes 55 min. So, it looks as though the way the target is
traversed, columnwise (as does GMB) or rowise (as PO does it), makes a big
difference in total measuring time. It's always been my experience that
measuring rows by rows, even from the days of ColorSynergy (bless these guys
hearts!), significantly cuts down the measuring time significantly.
What time does it take from Monaco Profiler to measure an ECI2002 chart on
the Spectroscan? Or Fuji ColourKit?
BTW, I'll take a Spectroscan got the price of an EyeOnePro anytime too ;-)
Incidently, any opinion on the Barbieri 100xy? Reads in an ECI2002 target in
under an hour, uses a 5mm patch size as compared with 6.5mm for the
Spectroscan. Uses a D50-filtered tungsten light source as compared with a
pure tungsten light source. Can be user-calibrated in the field with a
proper set of BCRA tile. But is it any good?
Roger Breton | Laval, Canada | email@hidden
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden