Re: Time to measure ECI2002 with a Spectroscan?
Re: Time to measure ECI2002 with a Spectroscan?
- Subject: Re: Time to measure ECI2002 with a Spectroscan?
- From: neil_snape <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 18:32:57 +0100
- Thread-topic: Time to measure ECI2002 with a Spectroscan?
on 3/11/05 17:45, Roberto Michelena wrote :
> So it's a tough match....
> The IO package (IO+Eye-One) should cost around the same as a DTP70, right?
Yet for those who already own an i1 it's a smaller step towards automated
fast reading. Even with a Rev A i1 it is decently fast.
>
> Advantage of IO+Eye-One is the detachable unit that allows for manual
> measuring of physical samples, of monitors, projectors, etc...
Yes the i0 is an accessory to the i1.
>
> Advantage of DTP-70 is switchable UV filter. Larger sheet size, too?
>
> Both can switch backing from black to white, but in DTP70 it's
> built-in white (not that I have a problem with that) while in
> IO+EyeOne it's whatever you put on the table.
>
> not an easy choice... the DTP70's UV filter is tempting. I wonder why
> they didn't make a removable or switchable UV filter on the Eye-One.
Are you sure you want a UV filter? If I remember right Graeme Gill said it
well with if you measure with a UV cut filter then how will you match the UV
component in the viewing condition?
I think for those who have the Lino have the advantage of the Pol filter
when necessary, yet the UV seems possibly redundant..
--
Neil Snape photographer Paris France http://www.neilsnape.com
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden