Re: Editing profiles [was New EyeOne ruler and soft case]
Re: Editing profiles [was New EyeOne ruler and soft case]
- Subject: Re: Editing profiles [was New EyeOne ruler and soft case]
- From: Ernst Dinkla <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 13:37:24 +0100
Tim Vitale wrote:
He wrote his own software to read the patches
and perform the iteration while using the GM PM4.1 engine create the
final profile. The consistent use of the GM PM 4.1 profilemaking engine
in both profiles, mine and his, is itself "conclusive proof" that his
exhaustive iterative process solved the 76/9600 problems.
So it is like this:
The software he wrote works outside GM PM. The measurement
data of the first target printed is used to make a first
profile with GM PM. A target is then printed again with the
first profile in use. That target is measured again and the
measurements are combined with the first measurements in the
special iterative software he wrote. The corrected
measurements are then fed in GM PM again and the resulting
profile is used to print the third target. Then the next loop
is done. In total 10-20 loops. With a 4000 patches target. And
it is correct, resulting in profiles praised by everyone.
I did understand it was a Herculean undertaking but this has
Sisyphus drama as well. Wonder how the fluctuations in
printing and measuring were dampened. Using only half of the
deviations per step ? So slower progress but staying on track ?
Was there more than iterative profiling that added to the
quality ? I do not mean David's skill but the method, the
computation outside GM PM.
--
Ernst Dinkla
www.pigment-print.com
( unvollendet )
--
--
Ernst Dinkla
www.pigment-print.com
( unvollendet )
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden