• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Instruments and models Vs. Accuracy.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Instruments and models Vs. Accuracy.


  • Subject: Re: Instruments and models Vs. Accuracy.
  • From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 18:14:12 +1000

edmund ronald wrote:
I'm just your average journo, but this discussion about instrument
precision has caught my eye - Is instrument  precision really relevant
these days ?

The construction of a behavioural model of a device (a profile in CMS
jargon) implies considerable assumptions about the physics of the
device.

Not necessarily. It depends on the details of the profiling software. General purpose profilers make very few assumptions about the physics of a device. They are the ones that needs lots of sample patches. If you start making models for specific types of devices, then you can get away with fewer patches, and your profiles are only good for devices that the model represents.

In either case, the accuracy of your model is going to depend
on the instrument.

So, now please convince me that existing mathematical models of LCD
screens and inks on paper, the size of the measure samples, and the
training and interpolation algorithms in the profiling software  are
good enough that a percent here or there in instrument precision or
repeatability actually matters *today*.

It depends a lot on what you are trying to do. If you want a profile to convert between fundamentally different color spaces (such as monitor to print), for a pleasing result, then instrument differences aren't going to have much effect. There's lots happening (gamut mapping), and nothing to reference to (subjective "pleasing").

If you're trying to do proofing, then instrument differences
can be highly significant. (ie. if you were to use different
instruments for the source and destination profiles.)
Near the white point, errors of < 1 delta E are rather visible.

My feeling is the instrument is probably the strongest link in the
chain these days.

Not really. It's hard to make a good, accurate, stable instrument for a low price.

Graeme Gill.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Instruments and models Vs. Accuracy. (From: edmund ronald <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Instruments and models Vs. Accuracy
  • Next by Date: Re: Barco vs Eizo
  • Previous by thread: Re: Instruments and models Vs. Accuracy
  • Next by thread: Goodbye ICC, here come Microsoft !
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread