• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Microsoft vs. ICC
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Microsoft vs. ICC


  • Subject: Re: Microsoft vs. ICC
  • From: Roberto Michelena <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 09:39:31 -0500

> One really interesting scenario would be an Adobe Creative Suite, which
> uses the Smart Gamutmapping of WCS for repurposing Adobe CS documents or
> for optimal gamutmapping to the printer. This could e.g. realized by
> converting the WCS transformation internaly to a ICC devicelink-profile
> for using it in a standard Adobe color environment.

Again you guys keep talking about this and it's totally irrelevant. It
can completely be implemented within ICC specs; furthermore, that's
exactly what the Imation CMM (or CFM as they liked to call it) did,
regardless of how successful (or not) it was. It is also done by
ArgyllCMS (unfortunately only command-line so far), and Adobe and
anyone else could do it if they wanted to.

-- Roberto Michelena
   Infinitek
   Lima, Peru
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Re: Microsoft vs. ICC (From: Jan-Peter Homann <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Kinda OT... Gov't Standards, MS doing a number... Global idiocy
  • Next by Date: Re: Profiling LCD projection systems
  • Previous by thread: Re: Microsoft vs. ICC
  • Next by thread: Kinda OT... Gov't Standards, MS doing a number... Global idiocy
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread