• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
ColorSync in Mac OS X 10.4 & Automator
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

ColorSync in Mac OS X 10.4 & Automator


  • Subject: ColorSync in Mac OS X 10.4 & Automator
  • From: Dwane Hollands <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:57:41 +0930

Hi,

It's been a very long time since I was on the colorsync forum. I've just been playing around with Colorsync on mac os x 10.4 & Automator, trying to create a PDF colour management workflow which is (free for one - I can't afford iQueue) and suitable for my printing company.

The idea is I use the Quartz filters to tag images, including the graphics in the backgrounds, so that when I put PDF's which contain images which have been converted to my profile initially they will be tagged appropriately. Then the graphic content (tints etc) can be colour managed aswell with a different rendering intent. (obviously so can the text and shading also be independent)

OK, the reason I want to do this is because I run Indesign 2.0 and there is no way to select a different rendering intent for my graphics and my images, I have to chose either/or. So If I convert to my CMYK profile in Adobe Photoshop, do all my editing etc, then place into Indesign "DON'T colour manage" - print to postscript distill (without colour mangement) and then run it through a queue to tag my images and convert to profile on my graphics with indepedent rendering intents I should be sweet - in theory.

I can then ask my clients to simply convert their images in photoshop to the correct profile, (without tagging the images) and don't colour manage the layout application which the images will be placed in. Then they output PDF's without colourmanagement and I apply the tagging and convert to profiles for the images and graphics respectively.

Basically I have a few questions:

1. Is colorsyncs conversion in PDF's any good at all or should I steer clear? (incidently I have found that once the PDF's have been modified by coloursync they are no longer editable in pitstop - that is to say individual images appear to be grouped into one large page item)
2. Does that workflow that I just described sound practical - or am I insane?


Currently we convert our images to profiles in photoshop (our custom CMYK profiles) and then place in Indesign - don't colour manage and output to the RIP PDF hotfolder. There are CMYK curves for 3 categories of paper (Coated Gloss, Coated matt, uncoated) which each have a queue. If this job is going to be on uncoated - it goes through the uncoated queue. The way we used to profile is we would run dotgain test formes to compensate for dotgain and map the results to a standard such as CGAT TR001 (that's if I can remember the standards name - 21% dotgain for K, 18% for CMY is what I remember. It's been a while).

This is so that the three paper types had the same dot gain response.

We would then run out a set of films (4) for each of the 3 categories of paper with their compensations applied of IT8/7.3 targets and profiled the press. The reason for this is, the graphic content would always be dotgain compensated without any colour management applied, the images would take care of themselves since they would be converted to the profile in Photoshop. It's also meant to be easy to update your profile by running dotgain test formes again and simply updating your RIP curves. No need to re-distribute profiles etc.

However - It's very lengthy process, and costly - since you have to run out films for dotgain and 3 different lots of (4) films for each category. Makeready etc. Waste paper on the dotgain test runs aswell as the profiling test runs. It makes it a mammoth task and means that it usually gets put off, instead of re-profiling.

I want to be able to use 1 set of 4 colour plates, whack em on the press, profile the first paper type, adjust solid ink densities and whammo, Stock category 1 done. Whack some different stock in there adjust SID's and whammo stock category 2 done. Same for category 3.

So that's why I'm looking at the convoluted workflow - which could be free and quite manageable using automator (which works pretty cool - you can setup a workflow for this in 2 steps)

ahhh. . . hmmm. . . Colour management makes me crazy!

<thankyou for your time and patience. . . if you read this far>

regards,

Dwane Hollands

--------------------------------------------------------------
HOLLANDS PRINT SOLUTIONS PTY LTD
Phone			          (08) 89 327 400
Fax					 (08) 89 327 411
Email	           email@hidden
-------------------------------------------------------------
Street:     		 6 McCourt Rd, Yarrawonga
                  		 Palmerston, NT 0830
Postal:                 PO BOX 3775
(send mail)         Palmerston, NT 0831
-------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: ColorSync in Mac OS X 10.4 & Automator
      • From: Chris Murphy <email@hidden>
    • Re: ColorSync in Mac OS X 10.4 & Automator
      • From: Nathan Duran <email@hidden>
    • Re: ColorSync in Mac OS X 10.4 & Automator
      • From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: [Fwd: Re: Metamerism vs Color Constancy]
  • Next by Date: Re: ColorSync in Mac OS X 10.4 & Automator
  • Previous by thread: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 380
  • Next by thread: Re: ColorSync in Mac OS X 10.4 & Automator
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread