• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Converting a DTP-41 to UV
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Converting a DTP-41 to UV


  • Subject: Re: Converting a DTP-41 to UV
  • From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 06:24:42 -0400

> If your viewing environment has normal or high levels of UV and you are
> dealing with Fluorescent Whitening Agents (which is usually the case), then
> filtering out the UV in your instrument is generally a bad move. If you
> are expecting to view in daylight or similar, then typical instruments with
> 'A' type illuminant don't have enough UV !
>
> Graeme Gill.

That is why the SpectroCam is such a unique intrument in that it is based on
a pulse-Xenon light source which has a lot of UV content relative to a
tungsten light source, yielding very different measurements in the presence
of FWA.

Roger Breton  |  Laval, Canada  |  email@hidden
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Re: Converting a DTP-41 to UV (From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: ColorSync in Mac OS X 10.4 & Automator
  • Next by Date: RE: Epson 4800 RIP
  • Previous by thread: Re: Converting a DTP-41 to UV
  • Next by thread: Re: Converting a DTP-41 to UV
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread