Re: Creating Proofs for ISO Coated & FOGRA Proof Verification
Re: Creating Proofs for ISO Coated & FOGRA Proof Verification
- Subject: Re: Creating Proofs for ISO Coated & FOGRA Proof Verification
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2006 12:21:46 -0500
Terry wrote (I didn't catch this):
>>> Terry Wyse
>>> By definition (almost) if a proof is made using characterization data
>>> from a real press and the proof is within, say, 1 dE of that data, then it
>>> should be capable of being matched on press.
I believe this statement needs to be qualified further by "given the same
instrument and filtration are used on both the press data and the proofer
data". Otherwise, IMO, as discussed many times before on this list (such as
in the case of the "New SWOP" characterization data which we know was
measured with a Spectroscan), there can only be a narrow set of conditions
under which, and we need to qualify this further by the word *average*, that
this is going to be the case. Don't you agree?
Regards,
Roger Breton | Laval, Canada | email@hidden
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden