• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Creating Proofs for ISO Coated & FOGRA Proof Verification
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Creating Proofs for ISO Coated & FOGRA Proof Verification


  • Subject: Re: Creating Proofs for ISO Coated & FOGRA Proof Verification
  • From: Joseph Yates <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:18:38 -1000
  • Thread-topic: Creating Proofs for ISO Coated & FOGRA Proof Verification

Title: Re: Creating Proofs for ISO Coated & FOGRA Proof Verification
on 7/15/06 4:06 AM, Klaus Karcher at email@hidden wrote:

> How well a certain Delta E conforms to the visual assessment depends on
>   numerous aspects. Some of the most important are:
> - size and distance of the probes
> - surround conditions
> - illumination (Luminance, ...)
> - applied color distance formula
>
> E.g if you compare results of DE76 (which is still in use for the FOGRA
> Media Wedge evaluation) with DE94 (which is used by most measurement
> device manufacturers to define the precision of their instruments) and
> DE00 (which is known to have the best conformance to to the visual
> assessment by now) in the yellow region, you will determine that a DE94
> or DE00 of 1 goes along with a DE76 of up to 5.4!
>
> Be aware of the precision of usual measurement devices which is in the
> same order of magnitude.

In setting up the ORIS Certified Proof – I am given a choice of Tolerances
of “Standards” like FOGRA / 3DAP / SICOGIF / or SWOP
Along with using 2-Level Tolerances (for example a low or strict value / and a higher or less strict value)

But it also allows selection of the Delta E formula used to calculate color deviations:

  • dE / dE94 / and dE2000

Considering what Klaus says about dE00 having the best conformance to the visual assessment – and ORIS stating that the dE94 and dE2000 give more weight to chromaticity, which comes closer to what the human eye perceives...

Would I be better served to change from dE to one of these other formulas in creating a more visually (and still numerically) accurate proof?


Joseph Yates
Pacifica Island Art, Inc.
Maui, Hawaii





 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Creating Proofs for ISO Coated & FOGRA Proof Verification
      • From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
    • Re: Creating Proofs for ISO Coated & FOGRA Proof Verification
      • From: "Roberto Michelena" <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: Creating Proofs for ISO Coated & FOGRA Proof Verification
  • Next by Date: Proofing Papers for ISO Coated Offset Contract Proofs
  • Previous by thread: Re: Creating Proofs for ISO Coated & FOGRA Proof Verification
  • Next by thread: Re: Creating Proofs for ISO Coated & FOGRA Proof Verification
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread