Re: Rip Software v2.0
Re: Rip Software v2.0
- Subject: Re: Rip Software v2.0
- From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 12:53:34 +1100
Marco Ugolini wrote:
We were also pointed towards a Spectroscan.
> That was a fine choice some years back. I had access to one, and appreciated
its usefulness at the time. Today it's obsolete, in my view: it uses SCSI
I think you mean RS232...
connections, it's slow as molasses, noisy as a car wreck (...almost), etc
Yep, although with a hex chart layout, and running the steppers the
right way, I can measure 1178 patches in about an hour, and it's
a bit less noise. (About 50 times slower than a DTP70 or i0, I know...)
Certainly if it's speed you're after, most things are faster (except
doing patches one at a time by hand.) I'm not sure that any instrument
at this level (ie. costing less than 10K) is more accurate though, and
few have the versatility in measuring transparencies (small apertures).
Graeme Gill.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden