Re: proof verification (was: Creating a SWOP proof with an Epson)
Re: proof verification (was: Creating a SWOP proof with an Epson)
- Subject: Re: proof verification (was: Creating a SWOP proof with an Epson)
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 16:12:45 -0400
> Did yo ever type something like "curl http://www.color.org/FOGRA27L.txt";
> in a terminal window? I think that's the way standards should be
> available today.
>
> Regards,
> Klaus Karcher
I completely agree, herr Karcher. No question. But, you know, I am tempted
to respond that TR-001:1993 is not a "standard", like Martin argued before?
(Sorry Martin, I could not resist this one)
Is a *standard* only a standard when it bears an ISO number? Then what are
Gracol and SNAP? The boundary between a standard and a specification is not
clear in terms of industry leadership. There are lots of folks who say they
adhere to SWOP, here, in North-America. Others say they adhere to Gracol.
Others, yet, to SNAP. And, in Europe, and I'd be curious to know in North
America, there are a lot of druckers who say they adhere to ISO-12647-x, and
get certified for it.
MfG,
Roger Breton | Laval, Canada | email@hidden
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden