• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Dot proofers
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Dot proofers


  • Subject: Dot proofers
  • From: Mark Rice <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 12:31:41 -0500

If you have an inkjet device that prints at 600 or 1200 dpi, and you are attempting to simulate dots that would appear on a 4000 dpi platesetter, there is no way you will achieve the same dot structure, or even the same screen angles.

Several years ago I worked with someone who was an excellent postscript programmer. He designed an algorithm that would feed in screen angles at 1 degree intervals, and then see what came out of the image setter (1200 dpi).

Here are some of the input angles and actual achieved output angles:

In			Out
1			.8
2			1.7
3			2.5
4			3.3
5			4.2
6			4.9
7			5.7
8			9.3
9			9.9
and so on.

Because the device did not have enougth resolution to place the dots in the appropriate xy coordinates to achieve the angles, a lot of compromises had to be made. In addition, the low resolution meant the exact dot shape could not be achieved.
So to me, these devices are worthless in terms of predicting moire. They can be very good at predicting color.


Mark Rice
www.zero1inc.com



Several years
On Mar 3, 2006, at 6:07 PM, Graeme Gill wrote:

Mark Rice wrote:
I find that the various types of "dot-proofs" are extremely deceptive. True,
in the past, the intent of proofing the dots was to predict moire. However,
most new dot proof devices are postscript driven, and do not have the same
resolution or dot forming engine of the CTP device the file will end up on.
Therefore, they only provide a deceptive dot that DOES NOT predict the
potential moire on the output device. The only proofing device I know of
that give absolute dot prediction is the Creo Spectrum, which can output
proofs and plates on the same device.

Maybe some are like that, but any serious dot proofer takes imagesetter output, not PostScript, and reproduces the actual dots, rather than inventing them.

Graeme Gill.

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Dot proofers
      • From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
References: 
 >RE: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 3, Issue 85 (From: "Mark Rice" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Profile compression
  • Next by Date: Re: Dot proofers
  • Previous by thread: RE: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 3, Issue 85
  • Next by thread: Re: Dot proofers
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread