• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Dot proofers
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Dot proofers


  • Subject: Re: Dot proofers
  • From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 10:27:46 +1100

Mark Rice wrote:
If you have an inkjet device that prints at 600 or 1200 dpi, and you are attempting to simulate dots that would appear on a 4000 dpi platesetter, there is no way you will achieve the same dot structure, or even the same screen angles.

There certainly are ways of representing the dot structure and color of a screened original on an inkjet printer, and maintaining the exact screen angles (been there, done that). The result is not crisp however (using any reasonable DPI inkjet), and there is a trade-off between sharpness, aliasing between the imagesetter screen and the inkjet screen, and color precession.

Several years ago I worked with someone who was an excellent postscript programmer. He designed an algorithm that would feed in screen angles at 1 degree intervals, and then see what came out of the image setter (1200 dpi).

Here are some of the input angles and actual achieved output angles:

In            Out
1            .8
2            1.7
3            2.5
4            3.3
5            4.2
6            4.9
7            5.7
8            9.3
9            9.9
and so on.

Yes, on some PostScript RIPs, this is the case. Others have better screening algorithms that don't have these limitations (look up supercell screening).

This has nothing to do with proofing imagesetter originals. The inkjet doesn't
have to have any sort of traditional screening algorithm to reproduce dot originals,
it just has to resample the image (paying attention to Nyquist filtering), before
processing through it's own usual color correction and stochastic screening.
You won't get the crisp screened dots of a proofing process that reproduces the
imagsetter output exactly (eg. chemical or equivalent), but the exact dot structure
is preserved, and the color may well be a closer match.

Graeme Gill.


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >RE: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 3, Issue 85 (From: "Mark Rice" <email@hidden>)
 >Dot proofers (From: Mark Rice <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Dot proofers
  • Next by Date: Contract Proof?
  • Previous by thread: Dot proofers
  • Next by thread: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 3, Issue 87
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread