• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Luminance nomenclature, STILL wanting to see constant L*
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Luminance nomenclature, STILL wanting to see constant L*


  • Subject: Re: Luminance nomenclature, STILL wanting to see constant L*
  • From: "Fleisher, Ken" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 07:32:31 -0500
  • Thread-topic: Luminance nomenclature, STILL wanting to see constant L*

On 11/2/06 3:37 AM, "John" <email@hidden> wrote:

> "Luminance" apparently means different things in different contexts.

Just because people use the term incorrectly in different contexts does not
make those uses correct. (Dare I mention the term "metamerism"?) Luminance
has a specific meaning whether or not people understand it and apply it
correctly.

Ken Fleisher

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Luminance nomenclature, STILL wanting to see constant L*
      • From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Luminance nomenclature, STILL wanting to see constant L* (From: John <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Multiple Active Monitor Profiles (Fleisher, Ken)
  • Next by Date: Re: Scanner Exposure Control
  • Previous by thread: Luminance nomenclature, STILL wanting to see constant L*
  • Next by thread: Re: Luminance nomenclature, STILL wanting to see constant L*
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread