Re: Time to upgrade EyeOne Pro?
Re: Time to upgrade EyeOne Pro?
- Subject: Re: Time to upgrade EyeOne Pro?
- From: Steve Kale <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 10:59:32 +0000
- Thread-topic: Time to upgrade EyeOne Pro?
Title: Re: Time to upgrade EyeOne Pro?
What are the merits of UV filtered vs not? I too was puzzled/annoyed to find Colorburst went down the UV-filtered route as I only have the non-UV cut EyeOne. When I looked into Colorburst their profiling engine did not support the EyeOne and so linearizing with a non UV i1 was not going to work with their profiles and one couldn’t make one’s own profiles because the i1 was not supported. This may have changed by now.
From: Dan Reid <email@hidden>
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 11:43:13 -0700
To: Dale Hoffman <email@hidden>
Cc: colorsync <email@hidden>
Conversation: Time to upgrade EyeOne Pro?
Subject: Re: Time to upgrade EyeOne Pro?
on 11/8/06 7:06 AM, Dale Hoffman at email@hidden wrote:
> Thanks to all who responded to my post concerning EyeOne Spectro Rev
> A upgrading.
>
> My original reason for looking into this was the requirement listed
> in Adobe's Print Certification guide that a UV spectrophotometer be
> used when preparing Colorburst profiles (see quote below).
>
> I am not sure I need a RIP except for Quark XPress files. I've been
> using EyeOne Match since the beginning with good results.
>
> Comments on the necessity for a RIP would be welcome.
>
> DaleH
>
>
>
> All phases of PrintCertification must be performed with the same
> spectrophotometer.
> A UV-filtered device is required-you will need a UV-filtered device
> to relinearize because all ColorBurst profiles were created with a UV-filtered
> spectrophotometer.
>
OK. Colorburst does use a UV filtered spectrophotometer for all their measurements. If you want to relinearize or PrintCertify color output a UV spectrophotometer is required, preferably the same manufacturer too. The X-Rite Pulse uses a different spectral measurement interval from Eye One which might impact results. So you might consider the Pulse as an option if you are upgrading from the Eye One. Frankly you could just add a CMYK module to your Eye One device and be on your way.
There are many reasons for choosing a RIP over the manufacturers print driver. With regards to color, allowing you to create CMYK allows you to control gray balance correctly, set proper ink limits, and create linearization curves using a color measurement device is the only way to ensure consistency. Print drivers do not support color measurement devices necessitating new ICC profiles if the color deviation to noticeable.
So if you goal is consistency then a RIP is required along with a color measurement device. If you are considering the ColorBurst RIP then the X-Rite Pulse would be a good choice.
--
Dan B. Reid
RPimaging
Color Management Products and Training for Print, Internet, and Motion Graphics
http://www.rpimaging.com | Toll Free: (866) RGB-CMYK
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden