• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Who does the seperations?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Who does the seperations?


  • Subject: Re: Who does the seperations?
  • From: Terry Wyse <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:42:14 -0500


On Jan 8, 2007, at 12:46 PM, email@hidden wrote:

My understanding is that a properly profiled RGB file, that is used to then convert
to different CMYK devices as a last step, is the best way to go - so i deliver aRGB.
It is very unfortunate that there is a lack of knowledge and standards out there.


This brings up one of the, I think, major problems with "late- binding" workflows where the photographer is simply asked to hand off tagged RGB and thus relying on the prepress/printer to separate the image properly to CMYK. The issue is one of Rendering Intents. I think most of us are aware that there can be up to about three rendering intents (relative colorimetric ("relcol"), relcol w/ bpc and perceptual) typically used to convert to CMYK. Choice of rendering intent can be as much an artistic choice as it is technical. Who better than the "artist" to know whether one should sacrifice accuracy and overall saturation (relcol) for a more "visually" or perceptually pleasing result (perceptual)? I can't see a prepress operator willing to make that decision so I think this should simply fall on the photographer in this discussion.

My vote would be for the photographer to make the first conversion (take the first "hit" to CMYK) to a "standard" CMYK color space (SWOP2006, GRACoL2006, ISO Coated, whatever) and then, if necessary, for the printer to make the final conversion to their specific press conditions, preferably via a device link profile. Certainly the big hit is that first move from RGB to CMYK with a relatively tiny move from "standard CMYK" to "press-specific CMYK". In fact, if a printer is at least adhering to either SWOP2006 specs for solid primaries/ secondaries or ISO 12647-2 for GRACoL2006 and ISO Fogra27/39, the only adjustment to press-specific conditions should be the different tone curves.

Would any of the prepress/print folks out there be willing to make the rendering intent decision or perhaps taking the time to use all three intents and showing proofs...at no extra cost to the job?

Regards,
Terry Wyse


_____________________________ WyseConsul Color Management Consulting G7 Certified Expert email@hidden 704.843.0858 http://www.wyseconsul.com http://www.colormanagementgroup.com


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Who does the separations?
      • From: Henk Gianotten <email@hidden>
    • Re: Who does the seperations?
      • From: Martin Orpen <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Who does the seperations? (Re: Profile Names and other suggestions) (From: email@hidden (Lee Blevins))
 >Re: Who does the seperations? (From: email@hidden)

  • Prev by Date: Re: ot - Mac-Intel printer drivers
  • Next by Date: Re: Profile Names (and output condition tag)
  • Previous by thread: Re: Who does the seperations?
  • Next by thread: Re: Who does the seperations?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread