• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: PS Preview
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PS Preview


  • Subject: Re: PS Preview
  • From: Dan Reid <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:05:48 -0700
  • Thread-topic: PS Preview

on 1/30/07 8:58 PM, Roger Breton at email@hidden wrote:

> Dan,
>
> You made all valid points in your arguments. The white border seems like an
> exellent idea -- I have yet to experiment with this technique. Your points
> about getting a close colorimetric match between screen and proof
> measurements are on the money; it's one thing to get the numbers to match
> but it's another to get a genuine appearance match.
>
> I would like to comment on your suggestion with regards to using the SPD of
> an actual viewing booth.
>
> I once took part in an experiment, at GATF, where an Epson profile was made
> to match (simulate) an analog Matchprint. Assume there were no fluorescence
> on the inkjet side of things -- there weren't any, for sure, on the
> Matchprint side of the equation, just not to get bogged down in arguing the
> influence of OBs here. Both characterization targets were measured with the
> same Spectroscan table, both in spektral mode. When creating the output
> profiles with ProfileMakerPro, we use the spkt measurements of a GTI light
> booth -- not D50, as the viewing light source. In the end, when we finally
> examined the simulation of the Matchprint by the inkjet under the GTI booth,
> having gone through the proper ICC color conversion, it was plain to see
> that the overall match was nothing to write home about. Could it be the
> measurement of the GTI was off? Could it be... Many things could have gone
> wrong. But I felt we might as well use D50 as the viewing light source for
> I don't think we would have been all that worse off, visually.
>

Yeah it's not a silver bullet by any means but it has reduced profile edits
quite a bit an has been improvement. Might I suggest pulling out yer'
eye-one pro and measuring your light source instead of using the included
ProfileMaker GTI measurement? Worth giving it a try since you won't have to
remeasure the profile chart again. Take care.
--
Dan B. Reid
RPimaging
Color Management Products and Training for Print, Internet, and Motion
Graphics
http://www.rpimaging.com | Toll Free: (866) RGB-CMYK



 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: PS Preview
      • From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: PS Preview (From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: some further thoughts on the Z3100
  • Next by Date: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 4, Issue 51
  • Previous by thread: Re: PS Preview
  • Next by thread: Re: PS Preview
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread