Re: Please check this conifg for me and give your opinion
Re: Please check this conifg for me and give your opinion
- Subject: Re: Please check this conifg for me and give your opinion
- From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:10:41 -0700
In a message dated 3/27/07 2:29 PM, John W Lund wrote:
> Check the list archives (or Colorburst's excellent support forum) for why
> they chose to build their linearizations & profiles with UV-cut instruments
> - this means you need to also use a UV-cut spectro to relinearize their
> existing "Environments".
Dumb choice, if you ask me (which explains why no one is asking me...). They
took something that worked with a non-UV-cut EyeOne Pro, and remade it into
something that requires you the user to buy another spectrophotometer (to
which I say: ciao!).
Let's see how long it takes for XRite to come up with profiling apps that
adopt in-software UV detection features similar to those to be found in
ProfileMaker in spectral mode. Or that perhaps offer the user an option to
use non-UV-cut devices. Or would that be too reasonable? :-)
Marco Ugolini
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden