• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Colour Management Gains [was: This is not good-Layoffs at X-Rite]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Colour Management Gains [was: This is not good-Layoffs at X-Rite]


  • Subject: Colour Management Gains [was: This is not good-Layoffs at X-Rite]
  • From: Martin Orpen <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:05:01 +0100

On 18 Apr 2008, at 00:33, Terence Wyse wrote:

It's too bad really that the design/creative hasn't embraced the technology as they stand to gain the most. But, the reality is that there's a lot of folks on the creative side that their jobs depend on the LACK OF color management (think press checks and chargeable image editing). It's not always in their best interests that color management would reduce the need for these services.

I don't believe that is "generally" true.

Put yourself in the position of a designer. A client commissions you to produce a brochure with a budget that nowadays consists of:

1. Allocation for images - photography and illustration

2. Allocation for copy writing (although this is often overlooked)

3. Allocation for the design and page layout work

4. Allocation for printing


Back in the good old days there was an allocation of cash for a stage or two before printing - the artists formerly known as pre-press.


That cash isn't still floating about as an opportunity for "gain" by the designer. It has been removed from the production chain and trousered by the client.

Image editing -- as in big retouching moves -- is fine because the client can see why why the model's head needs swapping for another one. But the little moves like colour matching and sharpening... the royalty-free image downloaded from Flickr should look as good as the commissioned photography should'nt It?

That's what colour management is all about isn't it? The client doesn't see any reason to pay for an additional stage in the production process because it's all automated now.


[An aside: A design consultancy that I used to do a lot of work for got a call from the world's biggest record company a few years back. "Why have you charged us for 'repro'?" The consultancy explained that they didn't have the expertise to separate images for magazines and newsprint or the ability to produce proofs. The response was "get a copy of Acrobat" and an outright refusal to pay any more repro charges.


This is a "win, win, win" situation for the record company because, when the product is delivered to them looking like a POS they've paid less than they should have in the first place and can then refuse to pay both the designer and the printer until the problems are fixed for free.]


They are paying for images which should automagically reproduce perfectly in any medium and paying for printing which should automagically offer perfect reproduction too - even if their eco- friendly designer is printing the job on uncoated, recycled blotting paper.


Designers do what is safe and expedient in the circumstances - get the printer to incorporate as much pre-press work in the print budget as they can and demand that the photographer provide print-ready images for the project.

And both suppliers are happy to oblige to win the commission - the photographer believing that "Image => Mode => CMYK" and an RGB proof from an Epson 2400 is "press-ready" and the printer believing that his nephew and a cracked PC version of Photoshop counts as a "pre-press department"

What exactly does the designer/creative stand to gain from taking responsibility for colour management in this situation?

I'm guessing that, if you knew the answer to that question, you'd spend your days in a black polo-neck sipping espressos while waxing lyrical about colour management in design consultancies... instead of in jeans and t-shirt supping sugary tea with the press minders... ;-)

Side-stepping the issue allows the designer/creative to back away and leave the photographer arguing with the printer about why the images suck. Involvement means investment in training/hardware/software and taking responsibility for both the image creator's and printer's inability to colour manage their workflows while arguing that the client stumps up additional cash - all without any guarantee of a return on the investment.

Regards

--
Martin Orpen
Idea Digital Imaging Ltd


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Re: This is not good-Layoffs at X-Rite (From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>)
 >Re: This is not good-Layoffs at X-Rite (From: Terence Wyse <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: This is not good-Layoffs at X-Rite
  • Next by Date: Re: This is not good-Layoffs at X-Rite
  • Previous by thread: Re: This is not good-Layoffs at X-Rite
  • Next by thread: Re: This is not good-Layoffs at X-Rite
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread