• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 118
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 118


  • Subject: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 118
  • From: Mike Strickler <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 11:14:32 -0700


If you have color-managed scanning, then it's mostly the inaccuracy from the film alone, which is usually greater than a from a scan back, but you can do nicely either way, especially if the film is EPY. Scan backs also have their colorimetric quirks, and after all, no matter what anyone says, photography of artwork is not colorimetric proofing--it's a far more complicated affair involving correct rendering of textures, for example, which can have a huge effect on what appears to be "correct" color. As far as resolution and huge scanners are concerned, its often not practical to scan a painting this way due to lighting and surface reflection issues, so you're back to setting up lights and applying traditional skills. In the latter case, if high resolution is critical, use something like Better Light or a big piece of film (8x10 or larger for big paintings) and a good scan.

Mike Strickler

MSP Graphic Services
423 Aaron St. Suite E
Cotati, CA 94931
707.664.1628
email@hidden
www.mspgraphics.com



Color correction is another question, and has little to do with the
resolution of the scan; rather, it is controlled by the accuracy and gamut
of the scanner-film profiling. That said, for fine-art reproductions,
scanning film is almost always inferior to a high-rez digital file from a
scan-back or Cruse scanner, because you have to deal with color inaccuracies
from two stages.


My opinions, YMMV.

Good luck with your project.



On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Frederick Park <email@hidden>
wrote:


Dear Friends of Colorsync,

I should like to inquire if any of you have knowledge of the highest
resolution scan capabilities of 4x5" chrome in terms of ease of color
correction and "best" or optimal final output size at 300 dpi. (Example:
500%, 5,000%, etc.) This project is two and three dimensional fine- art
reproduction.


Also I wish to ask if any of you know of service bureaus that provide
archival output on paper 60+ inches wide with either pigment based inks or
solvent based oil colors (wide gamut). Thanks for any help you may be.


With highest regards,

Frederick Park
Asheville, NC
www.apalache.com
828.505.2833






_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Prev by Date: So what does Preview.app *really* do when softproofing?
  • Next by Date: Re: Designers, Color Management, and Xrite , some thoughts and comments.
  • Previous by thread: Re: So what does Preview.app *really* do when softproofing?
  • Next by thread: Speaking of 2.2 vs 1.8
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread