• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Designers, Color Management, and Xrite , some thoughts and comments.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Designers, Color Management, and Xrite , some thoughts and comments.


  • Subject: Re: Designers, Color Management, and Xrite , some thoughts and comments.
  • From: Uli Zappe <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 20:29:14 +0200

Am 19.04.2008 um 20:07 schrieb Andrew Rodney:

I know that e.g. the authors of "Real World Color Management" think 2.2 is "the best" from
a visual POV. Others argue 1.8 is superior, still others favor *L.

Just don't muck around here at all, stick to native.

OK. This would be the most reduced version which could be fine for the most entry-level users, but I think a Preferences setting doesn't hurt.


Why guess? And we all know that a TRC 2.2 gamma is going to be a closer guess than 1.8.

On a Mac, it's the other way round.

But it doesn't matter really. Certainly not in ICC aware applications.

My point. :-)

Outside of ICC aware applications, its all science fiction anyway.

Outside of ICC aware applications, it's "stick to the default of the host OS".


I have pages and pages sent to X-Rite during beta. Here's an example of just
one: Display Wizard, Easy versus Advanced. I’m a new users who is targeted
to use this product. What’s the difference in Easy Mode versus Advanced?
Which should I pick and why? Text: Please verify your display type below is
ALL you need to say here.


In Advanced, IF I click on Optimize the Luminance Level, Optimize Brightness
is also checked but if I uncheck this 2nd check box, the first remains.
Also, there’s no clear understanding of what Optimize Brightness and
Luminance is, why do you have both?

I think "Easy" and "Advanced" mode is pretty much standard computer parlance, but I agree with you with regard to the "Brightness" and "Luminance" options.


Interestingly, the reason why I find these confusing is exactly the same why I would oppose replacing the term "gamma" by something more vague: I just don't know exactly what these options are actually doing; the really opaque term here being "optimize".

            Bye
                    Uli
________________________________________________________

  Uli Zappe, Solmsstraße 5, D-65189 Wiesbaden, Germany
  http://www.ritual.org
  Fon: +49-700-ULIZAPPE
  Fax: +49-700-ZAPPEFAX
________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Designers, Color Management, and Xrite , some thoughts and comments.
      • From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Designers, Color Management, and Xrite , some thoughts and comments. (From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 118
  • Next by Date: Re: Designers, Color Management, and Xrite , some thoughts and comments.
  • Previous by thread: Re: Designers, Color Management, and Xrite , some thoughts and comments.
  • Next by thread: Re: Designers, Color Management, and Xrite , some thoughts and comments.
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread