Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: ColorPort to MonacoProfiler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ColorPort to MonacoProfiler

Subject: Re: ColorPort to MonacoProfiler
From: Scott Martin <email@hidden>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:24:46 -0500


On Apr 24, 2008, at 1:18 PM, Todd Shirley wrote:

A big question I have is what is the difference between Bill Atkinson's it8.7 4 chart and the one generated out of Colorport (? Are they not the same 1617 patches? Why is Bill's "better"?

As far as I can tell they are the same and CP's is better for it's greater compatibility. Bill's RGB 1728 target is better than CP's because Bill's is 16bits and visually rich.

Scott Martin
www.on-sight.com

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden



References:  
  >ColorPort to MonacoProfiler (From: Derek Lambert <email@hidden>)
  >Re: ColorPort to MonacoProfiler (From: Scott Martin <email@hidden>)
  >Re: ColorPort to MonacoProfiler (From: Derek Lambert <email@hidden>)
  >Re: ColorPort to MonacoProfiler (From: Todd Shirley <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Re: ColorPort to MonacoProfiler

Next by Date:
Re: Colour management and photographers - another perspective.

Previous by thread:
Re: ColorPort to MonacoProfiler

Next by thread:
GRACoL & SWOP Tolernaces

Index(es):

Date
Thread