Re: GRACoL & SWOP Tolernaces
Re: GRACoL & SWOP Tolernaces
- Subject: Re: GRACoL & SWOP Tolernaces
- From: MSP Graphics <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 11:14:18 -0700
I doubt many people have a problem with some redundancies, extra
safeguards. I'm just saying that one shouldn't be overawed by this
stuff as it's based on proven best practices.
Mike Strickler
MSP Graphic Services
423 Aaron St. Suite E
Cotati, CA 94931
ph. 707.664.1628
fx. 707.939.4542
www.mspgraphics.com
On Apr 26, 2008, at 9:49 AM, Roger Breton wrote:
Could be that's all there is to it. Also, don't forget "factor 13",
13" in
front of the monitor (namely, the person). Until recently, I was
always
checking "smooth gray balance" in IDEA Link Curves. Turned out that
was
sub-optimal for what I was trying to do. So, on top of all the
factors you
enumerated, Mike, there could be some other "hidden" road blocks.
And, as
you see, it has nothing to do with paper or ink or the press. So,
it may not
be such a bad idea they're working over.
Roger Breton
Pre-Qualification," I think. Really, this is much ado about not
very much. I
know Don didn't intend this sort of mystique. If good paper is
used (with not
too much brightener, within ISO specs for color) and proper
attention paid to
fountain solution, blankets, rollers, squeeze, etc., the press
will "qualify."
It's just another way of saying that the printing system must be
maintained
and well-known, established practices followed.
Mike
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden