Re: The DDC situation - corrected post
Re: The DDC situation - corrected post
- Subject: Re: The DDC situation - corrected post
- From: MARK SEGAL <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 05:06:32 -0800 (PST)
Edmund,
Yes,
I too have experienced this and I agree with your sentiment here. But beyond that, the questions remain about how one gets this orchestra playing in sync when there is no conductor to sack the recalcitrant soloists.
Mark
________________________________
From: edmund ronald <email@hidden>
To: MARK SEGAL <email@hidden>
Cc: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>; ColorSync Users Mailing List <email@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 4:38:15 AM
Subject: Re: The DDC situation - corrected post
Mark,
My feeling is that this is not an issue of mandate or resources, but
just of philosophy, of way of working. Color maagement is not a
one-device issue, it's more like a hydraulic system where each part
needs to do its job without leaks. What I keep seeing from year to
year now is systems that work initially, and then fail suddenly
without warning. This gets frustrating.
Edmund
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 3:16 AM, MARK SEGAL <email@hidden> wrote:
> And what mandate does the ICC have to work on the DDC problem? What
> expertise specialized in that niche do they have to manage such a
> process? What resources would they need to do it, and how would they obtain
> those resources, from who, and what authority would they carry-over into
> implementation given the size and diversity of the target industry
> components? One advances by recommending options that have some prospect of
> operational significance, hence my questions to test this proposal.
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden