Re: ISO12647-7 question
Re: ISO12647-7 question
- Subject: Re: ISO12647-7 question
- From: Belinda Beckinsale <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:35:22 +1100
Thanks Mark, thanks Yves. I've been to the fogra site & found it very
helpful.
As I'm sure you're both aware, we diligently put wedges on our proofs and
actually measure them (I'm sure that's a rarity ;-) ), so we have no issue
with day to day proof certification (although we are running 3DAPv2 for most
things, not ISO/fogra). You did bring up another point that either I missed
or wasn't there when reading the draft standard...There seems to be no
mention of a period after which the whole production system needs to be
re-certified. I'm looking at it from our point of view as a proof provider,
so I'm going of the requirements of Annex A for production proofs in the
field, and it states it has to be demonstrated by a suitably equipped third
party that the proofs conform, but there's no mention of any requirement for
subsequent certifications down the track.
Does anyone have any ideas or know of a suitable time period? How long can
you feel confident that you conform before you re-test, or is it a self
policing thing? I thought maybe an internal check of all the requirements
might be useful every six months or so?
Ta, bee
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden