• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
UCR/GCR revisited
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

UCR/GCR revisited


  • Subject: UCR/GCR revisited
  • From: email@hidden
  • Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 07:24:58 -0700

> Rick Gordon writes on Sun, 8-June-2008 21:47
>> Requirements of smoothness and continuity in all the
>> separations require any black generation strategy to
>  be global in scope.
> ...
> Does that conflict with the statement above?

I think not. In fact I agree with your assertion that different images can
optimally benefit from differing K generation parameter settings.  My point
is that all the Profiles built with these various K schemes should share
one trait - that they be smooth & continuous in all their separations.  To
be otherwise, i.e. to have abrupt transitions or discontinuities, would
most likely cause noticeable artifacts in the print.

Harold



TOSHIBA AMERICA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS


Harold Boll  |    |   email@hidden


            " The sunlights differ, but there is only one darkness. "
Ursula K. Leguin





This message (and any attached files) is secret, confidential and proprietary and is intended solely for specific addressee(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply email and delete it and all backup copies immediately.
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: UCR/GCR revisited
      • From: Koch Karl <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: Choice of an iMac, mat or mirror?
  • Next by Date: Re: UCR/GCR revisited
  • Previous by thread: Re: UCR/GCR revisited
  • Next by thread: Re: UCR/GCR revisited
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread