• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: X-Rite ColorMunki review
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: X-Rite ColorMunki review


  • Subject: Re: X-Rite ColorMunki review
  • From: "edmund ronald" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:26:22 +0100

Mr.Tobie does have point re the non-linearities. But my theory has
always been that for photo I want smooth, not accurate. I told Xrite
that they should make Munki as good as they could because cheap
instruments have a way of displacing expensive ones - in the same way
i1 has displaced the spectrolino. I have no idea what actually went
into the hardware - if I did I wouldn't be talking :)

Edmund

On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Andrew Rodney
<email@hidden> wrote:
> On 3/18/08 9:03 AM, "Derek Lambert"  wrote:
>
>  > There is no way profile made with ColorMunki will be as good as made
>  > by Isis. If it is - who will buy Isis anymore?
>
>  Someone who wants to measure more patches automatically with and without UV
>  for starters. Someone who has to deal with CMYK 2nd. The profiles I built
>  with the colormunki, 100 patches (sometimes only 50 which is an option) are
>  on par quality wise from viewing distances from profiles I built to the same
>  device using 1700 patches in the iSis. Now X-Rite may not like that I said
>  this, and this was beta software (still is), and there are different color
>  engines here too. But for most users, if you held up under the light booth a
>  100 patch profile from colormunki and a 1700 odd patch from the iSis, they'd
>  be hard pressed to see a difference visually.
>
>
>  > If someone is willing to pay $100 for a icc profile I believe that
>  > profile will be better than ColorMunki made profiles because it will
>  > not be made with colorMunki.
>
>  You are encouraged to test this theory of yours on your own. I've done it on
>  my end, only to three Epson ink jet printers.
>
>
>
>  Andrew Rodney
>  http://www.digitaldog.net/
>
>
>   _______________________________________________
>  Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>  Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
>  Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
>  This email sent to email@hidden
>
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: X-Rite ColorMunki review
      • From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: X-Rite ColorMunki review (From: Derek Lambert <email@hidden>)
 >Re: X-Rite ColorMunki review (From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: X-Rite ColorMunki review
  • Next by Date: Re: X-Rite ColorMunki review
  • Previous by thread: Re: X-Rite ColorMunki review
  • Next by thread: Re: X-Rite ColorMunki review
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread