Re: The silence is deafening
Re: The silence is deafening
- Subject: Re: The silence is deafening
- From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 16:33:16 -0400 (EDT)
Matthew Kelly wrote:
> From my understanding of economics, the only incentive Xrite has to
>upgrade their software would be to maximize profits.
That's a bit too cut-and-dried for my taste. Too simple and abstract an explanation for something that has many complexities.
>If they can continue to sell a product and not have to invest in improving it,
>they will.
Is that the way it's been done so far? Keep living off the achievements of the past without having to invest in improvements? That's a recipe for entrepreneurial suicide.
>If they start to substantially lose sales to a competitor
>or competitors, they will either buy them up, or make a better product.
At which time it may be too late already, and they may have irretrievably lost their market share by reason of both neglect and backwardness. Which is yet another facet of the suicide strategy you are mentioning as Standard Operating Procedure.
Marco Ugolini
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
- Prev by Date:
Re: Re. inkjets: An open letter to Tom Lianza, anyone else who cares about color management, Apple, Epson, Canon, and Adobe.
- Next by Date:
Re: Re. inkjets: An open letter to Tom Lianza, anyone else who cares about color management, Apple, Epson, Canon, and Adobe.
- Previous by thread:
Re: The silence is deafening
- Next by thread:
Re: The silence is deafening
- Index(es):