• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: dot gain in appliocations
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: dot gain in appliocations


  • Subject: Re: dot gain in appliocations
  • From: "Jouni Marttila" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 15:15:10 +0300

Hello!

One thing you must take into consideration is that dot gain calculated from
densitometric values and from XYZ values can be different. E.g. for typical
coated fine paper in offset  correction factors are 1.25 for cyan, 1.05 for
magenta and 1.0 for yellow and black. So with XYZ values cyan will look to
have lower dot gain.

Br Jouni Marttila

2008/5/21 Legnani - Fineartprint.it <email@hidden>:

> Hello List,  I'm  a photographer and color  specialist (another Bruce
> Fraser son), working with an editor in high-end illuminated book
>  reproduction. I  shoot and follow the entire color workflow, from input to
>  output, I produce and edit the proofs (with one profiled Eizo CG-19,
> calibrated light – GTI – and Oris Color Tuner with Epson 3800) directly in
> the museum face to face with the original.  The proof and printing system is
> calibrated by me; together with the printer we do tests with visual files,
> ECI 2002, TAC etc to find a good paper/ink combination (we always use
> stochastic screening).
> As regards the printer, every time he prints a test and before printing a
> book with the relative ink/paper combinations, he calibrates the CTP with a
> specific software that targets the FOGRA characterizations. Since we use
> many different papers/inks, we generate our own profiles.
> The topic of my work is now this: I read the testchart with Measure Tool; I
> then have to decide on the right ink/paper combinations, by also evaluating
> the dot gain curve shown by Measure Tool and ColorThink. The two dot-gain
> graphic representations are quite different, (I know that dot gain is
> converted into status T-density in Measure Tool and is in XYZ in ColorThink)
> so my questions are:
>  Are the graphic representations the same between ColorThink and Measure
> Tool?
> Or perhaps in ColorThink they represent "something" (adjustment) after the
> profile construction?
> Is there another software package on the market that is able to read test
> charts and graphically evaluate dot gain for cmyk profile?
>
> Thanks to everyone for sharing their knowledge
>
> Roberto Legnani
> Bologna Italy
> www.fineartprint.it
> email@hidden _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >dot gain in appliocations (From: "Legnani - Fineartprint.it" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: basICColor_Testimages_2007
  • Next by Date: Re: dot gain in applications
  • Previous by thread: RE: dot gain in applications
  • Next by thread: Other pro profiling packages
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread